names and words and pieces of paper

the NAME exists as a word on paper (see http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/TradeNameBinder.pdf ). that's all it is. it is the belief in the paper's authority over our lives that gives it any standing.

a calling is something different. it is the name spirit whispers out to each of us. nobody else can hear it, yet it is the breath that blows down the house of cards.

just ask alice.

why worry?

http://mamaboogie.gaia.com/blog/2009/9/why-worry

i worry about the globalists' plans for world domination. but i'm not letting it go. i'm certainly not forgiving them their abuses against all of humanity. you want to tell me i should just get over it, that there's nothing i can do about it. but you're wrong. there's plenty to worry about when a war is being waged against all of us. denial won't make it go away.

where are the veterans of war? why are you not talking about what you experienced, so that we might know what war is really about? why do your voices remain silent? how will that help? if we don't talk about the past, if we refuse to learn the lessons, we will continue to repeat the same mistakes over and over again. we don't have to let the war continue. we can make it stop. open someone's eyes today. tell them something they didn't know or were afraid to think about. what are you so afraid of?

a few years ago, when i started blogging about conspiracy stuff, my husband grew fearful, worried the government would come and get me. well, that never happened. sure, they censored me, deleted my comments, they sent their trolls to try to derail my conversations at various message boards, and sometimes even in the comments of my own blogs, but that didn't hurt me any. actually, their antics only proved the conspiracy was real. but i'm no threat to anyone. i live here in tennessee with my husband, two kids, and a dog, we're not bothering anyone. were the army to come marching up my street to forcibly remove me from my home, then people might have to start looking at my words a little more closely, to see where the perceived threat could be found. the bad guys aren't gonna get you for speaking your mind.

that is where freedom starts, in the mind. your fears prevent you from saying what you really think, this reinforces the groupthink mentality that is presented as public opinion. it's all bullshit. what you think everyone else thinks has been fed to you through mass media and marketing (propaganda). it's everywhere, the lie is. but you do have truth within you. if you are afraid to share your truth with others, you only help perpetuate the lie.

you call yourself a friend...

you pitiful little guruboy
wanting idiots to follow you
thinking you have some answers
that might help them
when you can't even help yourself
and you call yourself awakened
while you walk around in denial
with your eyes closed tight
so you can't see what's real
and you can live in your land of makebelieve
with your mindless herd of asskissers
fauning over every false platitude
that spills from your lips
words that other more eloquent
bullshit artists used to fool you
your life is a lie
you are acting out your role
obediently
no different than the sheep
you think you are so high above
you suck
you delete my comments
because you can't stand truth
you are terrified of it
because truth might set you free
and you are afraid
that if you were truly free
you would just fuck everything up
so you live the life others have told you
is the life you should lead
instead of ever thinking for yourself
and making your own decisions
you have no wisdom to share with the world
you only have pretty words and lies
trickery and deceit are the tools of your trade
you profit from the broken dreams of others
selling enlightenment to those willing to pay
(they must not know the cost of giving up
their ability to think)
i'm not buying that crap
not from you
or from any other scumbag guru
so kiss my redneck anarchist bitch ass!

responsibility

i might just have to throw a really big hissy fit....

forgiveness, my ass! that's just permission to do it again.
no. hell no. no fucking way.

no compromises.
no meeting in the middle.
not this time, dammit.
not ever again.

no more blaming.
you fucked up and you know it.
own it.

inspiration

another comment (moderated/deleted) inspired by david miliband's blog
http://blogs.fco.gov.uk/roller/miliband/entry/out_of_iraq_back_into


there is no such thing as "free society" - civilization is the opposite of freedom. but you know that. you know that to be governed is the opposite of freedom. you know that freedom is the number one enemy of the state. you also know that there exists no government that does not depend upon war, and that peace will only come about with the destruction of the heirarchical structure of "civilized" society, in other words, freedom. war is not peace, but freedom would be were we all not brainwashed to fear it so.

patriotism, ethnocentricity, or racism? is there any real distinction?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8008572.stm
http://blogs.fco.gov.uk/roller/miliband/entry/walkout


those rude, disrespectful bastards! their actions only prove to the world just how true the words of Ahmadinejad are.

questions for david miliband

as my comment may or may not be approved by the moderators on his blog at fco.gov.uk, i'm posting it here.

is in reply to the following blog:
http://blogs.fco.gov.uk/roller/miliband/entry/stop_hamas_kneecappings_and_beatings

which included a link to the following speech:
http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/newsroom/latest-news/?view=Speech&id=14331081


dear mr. miliband,

i don't understand how we are supposed to believe that the institutions which rely upon war in order to govern us all, how are we supposed to believe these governments are going to ever make the war stop?

likewise, i don't understand how the institutions which created this current economic crisis are expected to fix the problems that they created? how does this make any sense?

if i took my car to a mechanic, and in the process of fixing one problem, they created a worse one that caused the engine to explode, i don't think i would be taking my car back to that same garage again. would you? but this seems to be what the public is expected to accept without question, if the media is any indication of anything at all.

as far as helping those whose lives have been devastated by war, i think it would be far more effective to stop bombing the place. how does that fit in your plan? are we supposed to pretend that the huge sums currently being spent on waging war are justified by throwing some, in comparison much smaller, amount at humanitarian aid?

government is nothing more than words on paper, written by liars and thieves

originally posted at http://tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=694

my family has a story, i bet yours does too, but it probably doesn't agree with the official history. my family's story turns history on its ear. everything they taught us in school is upside down and backwards. we can start in jamestown, since i know the paper trail goes at least that far back, but the story goes back much, much farther.

i pay taxes on a small piece of land that has been in my family since before white men came to north america. i'm still not sure why, or how this makes any sense. there was a settler at jamestown virginia who fell in love with and married a native woman. this isn't surprising, considering there weren't any other women around, only men and boys were allowed onboard seagoing vessels. ship captains were mighty superstitious about that. there's monsters in those waters, and women bleed. you don't want your little wooden boat smelling of blood, do you? oh no. well, anyway, this settler's wife, her family grew tobacco. he was making himself quite a little bundle selling the indian tobacco to the other settlers. and well, there was a dispute over the price he was charging them. so they locked him up in the boat there, to await trial. somebody in the family has his diaries. i've seen a photocopy of some of the pages. he mostly wrote about his wife, how beautiful she was, how intelligent she was, how fast she was learning to read and write english, what books they were reading. he asked john smith to bring back more books, when he returned from england with more supplies. he did not take the charges against him very seriously. they hung him without a trial, and brutalized his wife, left her for dead on the boat used as her husband's prison, adrift at sea. this is the story i was told. this is how government works. this is what was done to all of us, not just the native americans, but your ancestors, as well. she survived (which is more than you can say for most of the men at jamestown), and gave birth to twins...

in 1714 "Governor Spotswood appointed the Reverend Charles Griffin as schoolmaster to educate and christianize the Indian children in the first Christian Indian School in Virginia."
http://www.tourbrunswick.org/fort_christanna.htm

we were "christianized" and made to be ashamed. the spirits of our ancestors, who are here to help guide us and help us, we were told are suffering eternity in hell because they didn't pray to the right god.


"When I was a boy, the Sioux owned the world. The sun rose and set on their land; they sent ten thousand men to battle. Where are the warriors today? Who slew them? Where are our lands? Who owns them?"
~ Sitting Bull

on groupthink, or herd mentality

http://mamaboogie.gaia.com/blog/2008/10/your_god_is_not_my_god_or_dont_proselytize_at_me

[groupthink] involves believing that the members of your group are superior than people who are not in your group. (to say that some are “higher evolved” or “spiritually enlightened” is a prime example of this) groupthink also involves mind-control …. oh, but nobody wants to talk about that subject. i got some blogs i wrote, some articles i copied, too… mob enforcement of the rules. it involves giving away your freedom to act and think as you see fit in order to belong to the group. and that is my main problem, being an anarchist and all.

...

forming groups does not unify us, it divides us (us being all of humanity)! those who seek unity and world peace usually do so by forming some group or organization, and that act of separating themselves from others goes counter to the original intent of the group! but it feels good to be part of something, doesn't it? we don't want to be told how we are being manipulated and controlled, oh no, it's my choice, i'm doing the “right” thing, i care… yeah well, people need to start thinking about how the structure of our society harms humanity, rather than just taking it for granted that's how it is and how it should be and always will be.

...

seemingly everyone does it to some extent, everyone who justifies their beliefs with “the Bible says” … and you know good and well that is no different than “my teacher/guru says” … proselytizing is all the same religious indoctrination through fear of the consequences, regardless the outward appearance…. the worst are the ones who claim they don't do it, who think their religion is the ONE TRUTH that applies equally to all people, thus making it okay, this sort of religious exclusivism, it's even written into their rules (and they call it “helping” when they try to convert you to their beliefs)…

...

religion serves to prevent us from finding truth, within. sure, they say things to the contrary, they always do, them that tell lies. and the reason they tell those lies is because they are too afraid to find their own subjective truth, they feel that the objective Law that rules their lives should rule everyone's life. it's a lack of respect, mostly for themselves, they doubt their own ability to find their own truth. and it illustrates a profound lack of respect towards anyone and everyone who does not share their religious beliefs, to have this desire to convert, to preach their wisdom to others, thinking their subjective truth applies objectively to others.

it's about a lack of respect. gotta say it again, i suppose. because when you do find your own inner truth, it doesn't matter what anyone else says about it. you just KNOW. and knowing that your truth is not dependent upon what anyone else holds to be true, you gain respect for those who have found their own personal truth. this outrageous attempt to share your wisdom with others, to expect them to believe the things that are true for you, is symptom of a lack of connection to what is true. it's an ego thing.

...

communication is not about reaching a consensus and calling it “truth”
communication is about trying to find your own words to describe your own experience, so that you may share it with others. not to convert them to the truth of what you know, but to learn more about the things you don't know. <3

...

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
pros·e·ly·tize

To convert (a person) from one belief, doctrine, cause, or faith to another.



*****

brain·wash·ing
a method for systematically changing attitudes or altering beliefs



it's called euphemism… get a grip.
not only that, but brainwashing is when you attempt to change an adult from one beleif system to another. when it is done to children we call it “education”

it happens all the time, everywhere, people don't just lie to others, they lie to themselves. pretend that what they do is okay because everyone does it, or pretend they aren't doing what everyone else is doing, or justify them doing it, because it's different when we do it, we are the good people and they're the bad ones.

the original meaning of the word “anarchy” meant freedom. so why is it that myspace blocks any images with that word in the filename? it violates their terms of use, apparently they think it is “violent and offensive material”
why is freedom not allowed?

you crazy, bitch!

sanity simply means to act in accordance with what the majority of people consider to be socially-acceptable behavior. it's the measuring stick that says who is better at following other people's rules. to be labelled "insane" is the threat, the punishment, that keeps meek people in line, acting right, from fear of being a social misfit and outcast from the group.

http://mamaboogie.gaia.com/blog/2008/10/who_is_the_sanest_person_you_know

to think or not to think

http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=462&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30#p2703


to be given "beliefs" is to be either:

indoctrinated (what is done to children who have not established their own personal belief system)
brainwashed (when the same thing is done to adults who already have established beliefs)

this is why the modern education system fails. it is designed to prevent students from learning. our "education" is an attempt to prevent thought from happening. all information is pre-digested and downloaded, then regurgitated at will (such as when they are filling in little circles on those tests).

is this how you learn, how you think? are those thoughts your own, or are they straight from someone else, some authority (the Bible says... or as they say nowadays, my guru said...) instead of from that thinking part within you? i learn through experience, through my subjective perceptions of such personal experiences. anyone can memorize the times tables, but in order to multiply you must know how it works.

we are not machines, though we can choose to operate as such. that is our choice. to think or not to think. it's up to you. the abusive authority, the belief in groupthink, would threaten you with horrible consequences should you choose to think for yourself, but to allow the group or an authority to think for you is always your decision.

commentary

http://mamaboogie.gaia.com/blog/2009/1/for_i_know_that_the_hypnotized_never_lie_do_you

we all pay taxes. we know those tax dollars are being spent hand over fist to kill people who have never caused us any personal harm. we are complicit in our silence, in our consent to be governed by such a corrupt system that human lives are imagined to be expendable, in believing what we all know, deep down inside, are lies.

we knew all along that voting for obama was going to change nothing. we all knew it. we knew all along that it is utter foolishness to send money and warplanes to israel, so they can kill more palestinians. we all know it. we all know it’s wrong. propaganda exists, not to make us believe the lies, but to make us afraid to admit we disagree.

just look at the nonsense they want us to believe!! like the UN is going to stop a war that its very existence depends upon? nah… ain’t gonna happen cap’n. what needs to happen is to simply stop funding it. no more defense spending (defense, yeah right) no more war. simple. hellfire and damnation, no more defense spending, no more of that economic collapse they keep telling us about in the news….

we really could be free. we really could. so what is stopping us? i see no obstacle in the way. i only see masses of humans believing in obstacles that don’t really exist. i know. i know you know, too. problem i see is that there’s too many don’t know they know.

freedom, undefined

http://tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=355&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

freedom, as i see it, means that i get to decide for myself. freedom, if it were real, would mean that nobody has higher authority over what decisions i make. freedom would mean that nobody gets to decide for me what i choose to do, or to think, or to believe is true. *and* freedom would mean that everyone, each individual person, deserves the same respect to make their own choices for themselves. i do believe in our ability to be free. not only that, but i see it as an essential need, this human instinct to be free.


http://tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=465

freedom isn't about the majority. freedom is about each individual person choosing to stand in their own power, rather than giving that power away to abusive authorities, or to some group or organization, in the hopes they have our best interests at heart. can i realistically see humans choosing to be free? sure i can! not a problem. what i cannot realistically comprehend is how the current system that is based upon control and manipulation could ever sustain itself. it is doomed to fail from the get-go, as a flawed system it must collapse. the tricky part is, when it collapses, do we again allow another system based upon control to take its place? i believe everyone would rather be free than choose to be governed (govern means control), if they were aware that it is their choice to make for themselves.

send in the clowns

EU leaders agree on climate change deal

By CONSTANT BRAND, Associated Press Writer

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081212/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_eu_summit

BRUSSELS, Belgium – European leaders agreed Friday to stick to an ambitious plan to fight global warming through emissions cuts and renewable energy, and on ways to share the hefty costs of setting a global example.

The plan includes concessions to heavy industry and countries in Eastern Europe worried that the cost of curbing pollution would impede economic growth. The expense of the plan had caused uproar among many countries as the continent grapples with economic downturn.

The plan, agreed at an EU summit, lays out how the 27 member countries will cut carbon emissions by 20 percent by 2020.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who holds the bloc's rotating leadership, called the agreement historic and urged global partners to follow Europe's example at U.N. climate change talks in Poznan, Poland.

The French president says the 27-nation bloc has "now delivered" and it was "now the time" for others, including the United States and China, to follow suit.

"People will not follow Europe unless we set the example," he said.

EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called the plans "the most ambitious proposals anywhere in the world."

"Europe has passed its credibility test," he said.

An EU deal could breathe new life into the U.N. climate talks, which were expected to wrap up Friday with a work plan for talks over the next year on a new global warming treaty. But that plan needs worldwide support.

The eyes of Europe's economic rivals were on the EU talks to see how the bloc manages to balance economic growth while keeping intact promises to rein in emissions.

"The overall political message that we have sent to the rest of the world is that Europe is taking the lead," Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said at a news conference after the talks, confirming that the leaders agreed on the climate package.

European diplomats haggled through the night on complex plans to fulfill promises made last year to meet so-called 20-20-20 targets: reducing greenhouse emissions by 20 percent and ensuring that 20 percent of energy comes from wind, sun and other renewable sources by 2020.

Desperate to get a deal, France backed several opt-outs to the strict reductions it wants industries to make. The opt-outs are aimed at heavy industry that might flee abroad to regions with looser environmental rules.

France also proposed leeway for countries very dependent on coal and oil for power generation — but the EU plan that this must be temporary.

The leaders also agreed on a euro200 billion ($258 billion) Europe-wide economic stimulus package to ease the effects of a recession. The downturn overshadowed talks on the costly climate deal.

(emphasis mine ~s)

Personal Responsibility

As a human Person and inhabitant of Planet Earth, I am hereby formally announcing that the corporation known as United States of America needs to be held accountable for its actions. According to its own laws, the government is guilty of heinous crimes against humanity in general, as well as many millions of individual persons both in the past as well as present day. The counts of murder, alone, are too numerous to ever be comprehensively documented.

How far in the red do the books have to go before such a corrupt corporate entity is forced to declare bankruptcy? Why has this not happened yet? What is wrong with us, We The People, that we would allow these atrocities to continue? Why did the entire world stand idly by and watch as the land was outright stolen from the original inhabitants of this continent? But stealing the land wasn't enough, it must be tamed, brought under human control, beaten into submission, just like The People.

I have been beaten, but I refuse to cower in fear and watch my children suffer the same abuses. I am a Person, first and foremost, I am not a slave. I am not the property of the state. I have within me a conscience, something corporations lack because they are not human. No corporate entity, not any government nor religious institution, has higher authority than the conscience that lies within each human Person. I am declaring all laws that would claim higher authority over my actions than my own conscience, null and void. I am my own authority. I signed no contract, I entered into no covenant, I uttered no spoken agreement to the terms of any objective Law. I am not obliged to obey the abusive authority of church and state.

the question was

What do you want from our leaders?

i want absolutely NOTHING from them!
i don't need them to tell me what to do.
i want to make my own decisions about my own life.
i would like for all authorities to recognize that
they can't make decisions for anyone but themselves.
i would like for everyone, not just the so-called leaders,
everyone to heal from past abuses and
childhood indoctrination into obedience and control.
and then we can all be free.

once there is no longer any government to support it,
war will cease to exist.
So this is my final answer to the question:
I WANT WORLD PEACE!!
i will accept nothing less than that, if they expect my support.
i have yet to find a leader worth following.
maybe they are out there somewhere.
hiding.

***

i do not believe in politicians. i do not believe people should vote to give their decision-making rights away to government. i do not believe anyone needs to be governed and ruled and controlled. i do not believe in majority rule. i believe everyone should be free.

fixing the old system which is broken is not a viable option. how can we depend on government to fix the problems it has created? we cannot. history shows us that. history shows that replacing the old rulers with new ones does not free anyone. we do not need to figure out a way of making the old system work, it won't work, it never has, and it never will. what needs to happen is we need to stop trying to control everything, and allow a natural system to emerge.

***

Building a new order is not the way. Allowing a natural order to emerge is the only answer that is not inherently flawed. It is mankind's sick desire to control everything that has gotten us into this mess. No human person is higher authority than any other person's innermost guide. We do not need to be governed, controlled, manipulated, and abused by authority figures who think they should make decisions for us. We can choose to be autonomous and free instead. It's a choice each person must make for themselves, though, else it just doesn't count.

Freedom is within our grasp. Please let us not screw it up by playing into that same control game that got us where we are today. Replacing the old rulers with new ones will not free anyone. History has shown us that, over and over and over again. It's time we learned from past mistakes and do things differently. For the children.

***

politicians are not leaders, they are rulers.
rulers are people who want to lead.
leaders are people others want to follow.
big difference.

another perspective

link

"As to their economical conceptions, the anarchists, in common with all socialists, of whom they constitute the left wing, maintain that the now prevailing system of private ownership in land, and our capitalist production for the sake of profits, represent a monopoly which runs against both the principles of justice and the dictates of utility. They are the main obstacle which prevents the successes of modern technics from being brought into the service of all, so as to produce general well-being. The anarchists consider the wage-system and capitalist production altogether as an obstacle to progress. But they point out also that the state was, and continues to be, the chief instrument for permitting the few to monopolize the land, and the capitalists to appropriate for themselves a quite disproportionate share of the yearly accumulated surplus of production. Consequently, while combating the present monopolization of land, and capitalism altogether, the anarchists combat with the same energy the state, as the main support of that system. Not this or that special form, but the state altogether, whether it be a monarchy or even a republic governed by means of the referendum.

The state organization, having always been, both in ancient and modern history (Macedonian Empire, Roman Empire, modern European states grown up on the ruins of the autonomous cities), the instrument for establishing monopolies in favour of the ruling minorities, cannot be made to work for the destruction of these monopolies. The anarchists consider, therefore, that to hand over to the state all the main sources of economical life - the land, the mines, the railways, banking, insurance, and so on - as also the management of all the main branches of industry, in addition to all the functions already accumulated in its hands (education, state-supported religions, defence of the territory, etc.), would mean to create a new instrument of tyranny. State capitalism would only increase the powers of bureaucracy and capitalism. True progress lies in the direction of decentralization, both territorial and functional, in the development of the spirit of local and personal initiative, and of free federation from the simple to the compound, in lieu of the present hierarchy from the centre to the periphery. "

how government works

first, you form a committee.
and this committee has to represent differing points of view
(for fairness, you know).
so everyone sits around arguing about what needs to be done
for a good long while.
once it is finally decided what needs to be done,
everyone sits around arguing about how to best get it done.

...and nothing ever gets done.

i believe in freedom

so i deleted a bunch of stuff. so what? it's just words, i have plenty more where those came from. today my thoughts are turning to FREEDOM, and it's been a while since i addressed this subject. so here goes...


I believe that:

• freedom is the ability to make decisions
• when we are not allowed to make our own decisions, we are not free
• governments and religions serve to prevent people the ability to make their own decisions by inventing external objective man-made rules, laws, commandments, if you will, rather than pointing out to them that the only place answers are ever to be found is within, through introspection.
• governments and religions and other such control-based human constructs such as mass media also serve to prevent people from being aware that it is up to them what they decide to do, to think, to believe, to act.
• the denial of people to make their own decisions is ABUSE
• all institutions that deny people the ability to decide things for themselves are ABUSIVE towards the very people who have been indoctrinated from childhood to believe those institutions are neccessary and good.
• GOOD vs EVIL is the root of all lies, a false distinction that was invented for the sole purpose of controlling people, effectively preventing them from making their own decisions.
• control-based institutions offer their subjects the false choice between two "sides" (take your pick, light vs darkness, liberal vs conservative, etc. ad infinitum)
• control-based institutions do not allow anyone to point out any other options (through control of mass media, education, and religion)
• people cannot make informed decisions if they are not informed nor allowed to decide.
• information is carefully controlled. whenever anyone speaks too much truth, there is widespread attempt to misdirect, misinterpret, and dumb it down for the masses who must not be allowed to realize that the choice is theirs to make.
• we have all been abused by the very government, education system, and mass media that we have been taught is for our own good.
• anyone who does not OBEY the rules, the laws, is said to be bad. it becomes a sin to question authority. threats are used to enforce obedience. you will go to jail, you will burn in hell for all eternity, you won't have any friends, people will think you are weird or strange, you will be labelled with some horrible label, whatever. be AFRAID! OBEY or else.
• unquestioning obedience to any external authority is the complete and total opposite of freedom.
• we have been so abused as to think we are not worthy of making decisions for ourselves
• we have been repeatedly told how bad we are, we were born sinners, we need to overcome our failings, there's something bad wrong with us if we aren't happy all the time, we are bad bad bad... and the abusive system is perpetuated.
• abuse begets more abuse. ...but not always. it's always YOUR choice whether to allow or deny another human the freedom we all deserve.
• lastly, i do believe that all people are "good" (because i do not believe evil exists except as a judgment people make about things and people that cause them harm) and that all people are perfectly capable of finding their own answers, making their own choices.

stupid government bullshit lies

Someone told me today not to call people stupid. Here is my response:

When people CHOOSE not to think, i feel justified in calling them stupid. They got these huge motherfucking brains they don't want to use. STUPID. I believe it's a choice, to be stupid, or to think, and there's no excuse for letting other people do their thinking for them. NO EXCUSE!! Even someone with a really limited brain capacity can think, if they want to. I know plenty of unintelligent people who are not stupid, because they choose to use what brains they got. And I know many more highly intelligent people who are just plain stupid and that's all there is to it.

the system we have is built on lies. the lies keep getting bigger and bigger, and it's just going to collapse on itself. it was never stable to begin with. the only system that can sustain itself would be built upon a natural order, rather than this human attempt to control things we currently have. you know, all that anarchy stuff i like to go on about. freedom, autonomy, the right to make our own decisions rather than constantly being told what we should do, what we should believe, how we should act... and all those rules and laws, they only serve to make us believe we are bad and make us afraid to look within to find our own truth. that's what it's all about, you know. Making our own decisions, based upon the truth we find inside rather than on what other people might think or say. And the one thing standing in the way of acheiving that kind of freedom is the fact that people would rather be told what to do than look within and find their own answers, it's easier, gives them someone else to blame when things go wrong. And i think it's just plain STUPID.